Why you cannot take a cracker and grape juice and call it Communion

This question comes up often, and it usually comes wrapped in sincerity. Why can you not take bread from your cupboard, pour a glass of grape juice, pray with faith, and call it Communion? The Catholic answer is simple, but it is not casual. Because Communion is not a private act, and the Eucharist is not food plus intention. From the beginning, the Church has understood that Eucharist and priesthood stand or fall together. Once you separate them, the entire structure collapses.

To see why, you have to start where Jesus Himself starts, with the logic of Jewish worship. In the Law, sacrifice always required three things. There had to be a real offering, a consecrated altar, and a valid priest. Remove any one of those and the sacrifice failed. This was never about personal feeling or enthusiasm. Kings were forbidden from offering sacrifice. Prophets did not do it either. Only priests, set apart and authorised by God, could stand at the altar. That framework matters, because Jesus Christ does not dismantle it. He fulfils it.

The Last Supper is where this becomes clear. It is not a farewell meal and it is not informal table fellowship. It is a priestly act carried out deliberately and publicly. Jesus takes bread and wine, blesses them, speaks over them, and offers Himself before He goes to the Cross. He does not say the bread represents His body. He says it is His body. He does not address the crowd. He speaks to the Apostles. Then He gives a command, “Do this.” Those words are not vague. In a Jewish context, they are liturgical and priestly. This moment mirrors Passover. The lamb is sacrificed once, but the meal is how each generation participates in that sacrifice. Calvary happens once. The Eucharist makes that one sacrifice present.

This is why the Church insists that the Eucharist is sacrifice, not symbol. It is not a reminder snack or an act of memory dressed up with religious language. The New Testament is explicit about this, especially in the Letter to the Hebrews, which frames Christ as High Priest offering Himself and entering the true Holy of Holies, not made by human hands. If there is sacrifice, there must be priesthood. That is not a later Catholic invention. It is the logic Scripture itself uses.

Priesthood, then, is not optional. In Jewish worship, authority mattered because reality mattered. You could not appoint yourself. You could not mean it strongly enough to make it work. Jesus preserves this structure. After the Resurrection, He gives the Apostles authority, including the authority to forgive sins. That authority is handed on through the laying on of hands. It does not float free. It is transmitted. This is Holy Orders. When a priest stands at the altar, he does not speak as a private believer recalling something Jesus once said. He speaks in the person of Christ. The words of consecration are not quotations. They are actions.

Once you walk through the Mass with this in mind, the logic becomes unavoidable. The altar is consecrated because sacrifice requires a holy place. The priest is vested because he is acting publicly, not personally. Confession comes before sacrifice because purification always precedes offering. The Word of God is proclaimed because God speaks before He is offered. Bread and wine are brought forward, received, and set apart because offerings do not offer themselves. The priest prays for acceptance because sacrifice is never automatic. Then, at the centre, the Eucharistic Prayer is spoken by the priest alone, invoking the Spirit and speaking Christ’s words. The offering is lifted, adored, and offered to the Father before it is received by the people. Communion follows sacrifice, not the other way round.

This is why the cracker and grape juice idea fails, even when it is sincere. A kitchen table is not an altar. Private intent is not priesthood. Self-appointment is not ordination. You can pray. You can remember Christ. You can love Him deeply. None of that creates a sacrament. Jewish worship never worked that way, and Christian worship does not either. If anyone could consecrate, priesthood would mean nothing. If priesthood means nothing, sacrifice disappears. If sacrifice disappears, the Eucharist becomes a symbol. Catholic faith refuses that collapse.

This is not legalism and it is not about control. It is about reality. Sacraments work because Christ acts, and Christ acts through what He Himself established. He does not contradict His own logic. The Church guards the Eucharist not because it is fragile, but because it is real. The Eucharist is sacrifice. Sacrifice requires priesthood. Christ bound the two together, and that is why Communion cannot be improvised, and why a cracker and grape juice, however sincere, is not the Eucharist.

Posted On: Wednesday, January 7th, 2026 @ 1:20 am by Ian Tearle

0 Comments

There are no comments on this entry. You should add one below.